On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 15:36:17 -0500, Kurt postdive@postdive.com wrote:
Understood. Not having any more documentation than you supply, I offered that information in case 1) it worked, and 2) subsurface implementation was suspect.
Let's make sure we keep things separate. Subsurface is a different project - Jef is doing libdivecomputer which subsurface uses.
I'm not sure what's going on with winusb/libusb0/libusbk and don't really want to know. Atomic is probably using libusb0 because thats what libusbdotnet uses and that's that.
Zero of the active developers of subsurface are actually using Windows machines. I build the binaries because people asked for Windows binaries, but I have no access to a physical Windows machine most of the time and only tested it briefly. The same goes for Mac support. It builds just fine, but I haven't even managed to get working binaries together (no time). But on the Mac we at least have a couple of contributors who apper to be using subsurface.
Oh well, I guess I'll never have a useful dive log for the Atomic on the Win platform, MacDive here we come….
Unless you want to get involved and help us make subsurface better on Windows... contributions and feedback are always welcome. The git tree contains early draft documentation (currently, once again, mostly written with the Linux user in mind). We'll be happy to create (with your help) outstanding Windows documentation that will make it easy for the non technical person to use subsurface on Windows (and with an Atomic Cobalt). But without someone stepping up and helping with that, no, it won't happen.
/D